Wings of Liberty • December 29, 2023

Migrant Invasion: Who’s Behind It?

Analysts and some politicians are urgently ringing the alarm bell about the relentless waves of illegal migrants coming into the United States through the porous southern border. The figures are stunning. Six million migrants have entered the United States illegally since the beginning of the Biden regime. On average, ten thousand illegals per day cross the southern border. On Monday, December 18 alone, 14,509 entered illegally.


Increasingly desperate pleas from southern border states have fallen on deaf federal ears. Texas has taken the extraordinary step of passing legislation allowing state law enforcement to arrest illegal migrants and for state judges to deport them. The Biden regime, complicit in the invasion of its own country, has no intention of securing the border but objects to Texas attempting to secure its own territory using what it says is a federal power. A legal challenge from Biden’s DOJ would likely proceed to the Supreme Court.


Surveillance footage has proven that some of the migrants are armed. Reports have repeatedly detailed that a large number of military-aged Chinese men are crossing the border. Multiple arrests of suspects on the FBI’s most wanted list have occurred. Some in Washington have raised the specter of Hamas-style domestic incidents. No government agency has a significant grasp of who the migrants are or what they are doing when they cross the border.


Whatever the White House might say, this is not immigration under any normal usage of the term. Ten thousand migrants do not come to the border of a country each day without serious infrastructure and coordination behind their journeyings. They need food. Directions. Money. Accommodation. And an incentive to be on the move. So, who is coordinating the mass movement of illegal migrants to the U.S. southern border?


Some have noted the similarities between western leaders, and the coordinated creation of policies which have repeatedly served to undermine the strength and independence of the countries they serve. Migration is one of those issues. Justin Trudeau is bringing nearly half a million people into Canada per year. Macron has done similarly in France. Trudeau, Biden, Macron, Jacinda Ardern (since replaced), Merkel (since replaced), Boris Johnson (since replaced) and others all coordinated with globalist powers on key issues such as digital ID’s, increased censorship of the internet, punishment and marginalization of the holdouts who refused the Covid shot. Global coordination on these issues means a corresponding reduction in national sovereignty and the privacy of citizens.


Criticism of G7 leaders on these issues is warranted and justified. There could hardly be enough.

But there is one central figure that no American politician has publicly called out. This individual is Pope Francis. Francis has repeatedly railed against national sovereignty in favor of a globalist centralist authority under his moral guidance. Francis and the WEF claim that global problems need global solutions, and regional interests interfere with centralized power. Francis has called for the big tech companies to muzzle free speech. Francis spearheaded the global religions calling for global action on climate change. And no one has done more globally to undermine national sovereignty, and especially national borders, than Jesuit Pope Francis.


Perhaps it is just a really big coincidence that all of the western leaders who support the papal push for one world government are all Catholic. Is it likely a coincidence that the exact policies that Francis wants implemented are being imposed by Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron and Joe Biden, all of whom are Catholic, and all of whom have a religious obligation to honor the decrees of the Roman Pontiff above the interests of their own nations? Why is the Biden administration working with Catholic non-government organizations to actively facilitate the invasion of America, instead of attempting to prevent it?


The vast majority of illegal migrants to the United States are indisputably Catholic. Who can convince millions of Catholic people to leave their own countries and invade another country, except the leader of the Catholic Church? Catholic charities coordinate, facilitate and fund the migrants as they journey to illegally invade a sovereign nation. Catholic charities house and feed the migrants while they journey from South and Central America to northern Mexico. Within the United States, the Catholic Church transports and houses hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants throughout the country once they arrive.


Who can forget the image of Pope Francis travelling to the Rio Grande river on Mexico’s northern border in 2016, and praying at the border wall erected to safeguard America’s national autonomy?


Invading forces in Bible time repopulated conquered areas to break the national spirit.  Deporting substantial portions of the original inhabitants and replacing them with a mix of foreigners with no particular national allegiance or religious cohesion made rebellion unlikely.  the assyrians did it.  The Babylonians did it. The Romans did it.


And the Roman Papacy is doing something similar. The Papacy’s facilitation of illegal migrants into the United States is an act of aggression against the Constitution and laws of the United States. It is an assault on national sovereignty. And it should be recognized and treated as such.


America is founded on the principles for which the martyrs died in the Protestant Reformation. Out of extreme papal persecution and the fires of the Inquisition come the American reforms of inalienable rights, freedom of speech, liberty of conscience, due process, and the right to remain silent.


The Counter Reformation was instituted to overthrow Protestantism and all these principles, and to return the world to papal control. The home of these principles is America. Global papal resurgence means American deterioration because freedom is the antithesis of papal doctrine.


Think about that next time you contemplate millions of people overrunning the southern border at the instigation of the Catholic Church.


____________________________


Sources:

 

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/how-feds-use-charities-hide-the-true-cost-the-us-border-crisis


https://www.heritage.org/homeland-security/heritage-explains/who-helping-biden-facilitate-americas-border-crisis


https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/live/pope-francis-at-us-mexico-border/


https://www.foxnews.com/us/migrant-caravan-heads-toward-us-blinken-urges-mexico-help-end-irregular-migration


https://www.yahoo.com/news/arizona-border-rancher-saw-ms-110013994.html


https://www.foxnews.com/video/6343938251112


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2023/12/25/ron-johnson-global-governance-no-borders-behind-lefts-support-of-lax-immigration-policy/


https://www.foxnews.com/video/6343893407112


https://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/13.htm



By Wings of Liberty July 6, 2025
In times of persecution and danger, anonymity has long been the necessary cloak for the truth. Speaking of the oppression under which the truth labored as the Revolutionary War approached, the eventual second president of the United States, John Adams, anonymously stated the following in the Boston Gazette in 1765: Every body knows how dangerous it was to speak or write in favour of any thing in those days but the triumphant system of religion and politicks. And our fathers were particularly the objects of the persecutions and proscriptions of the times. It is not unlikely therefore, that, although they were inflexibly steady in refusing their positive assent to any thing against their principles, they might have contracted habits of reserve, and a cautious diffidence of asserting their opinions publickly. These habits they probably brought with them to America, and have transmitted down to us. i Adams was saying that the pilgrims who fled Europe passed down a knowledge of the dangers which public opinions could bring from kings and priests. The Papacy was hostile to not only religious freedom, but to freedom of thought, speech and the press. English monarchs, both Catholic and Anglican, had harshly punished dissenting views. The “fathers” Adams references are those who suffered for their faith and opinions in the public square, even to the point of martyrdom. They had consequently learned to be careful when expressing their views publicly, especially on the “triumphant system of religion and politicks”. Today, many so-called Christians loudly (and often arrogantly) demand that church and state once more come together in America and enforce their version of Christianity on the population by force of law. ii But of course such a system will result in the same oppression and punishment of dissent as it has in the past. Politicians and advocates of church/state union in America might be surprised to hear the second president of the United States speak with such ardor against their cause. But John Adams denounced the union of church and state as “tyrannical” and “wicked”. Hear this father of American independence in his own words: Since the promulgation of Christianity, the two greatest systems of tyranny that have sprung from this original, are the canon and the feudal law … By the former of these, the most refined, sublime, extensive, and astonishing constitution of policy that ever was conceived by the mind of man was framed by the Romish clergy for the aggrandizement of their own order. All the epithets I have here given to the Romish policy are just, and will be allowed to be so when it is considered, that they even persuaded mankind to believe,faithfully and undoubtingly, that God Almighty had entrusted them with the keys of heaven, whose gates they might open and close at pleasure; with a power of dispensation over all the rules and obligations of morality; with authority to license all sorts of sins and crimes; with a power of deposing princes and absolving subjects from allegiance; with a power of procuring or withholding the rain of heaven and the beams of the sun; with the management of earthquakes, pestilence, and famine; nay, with the mysterious, awful, incomprehensible power of creating out of bread and wine the flesh and blood of God himself. All these opinions they were enabled to spread and rivet among the people by reducing their minds to a state of sordid ignorance and staring timidity, and by infusing into them a religious horror of letters and knowledge. Thus was human nature chained fast for ages in a cruel, shameful, and deplorable servitude to him, and his subordinate tyrants, who, it was foretold, would exalt himself above all that was called God, and that was worshiped. In the latter we find another system, similar in many respects to the former; which, although it was originally formed, perhaps, for the necessary defense of a barbarous people against the inroads and invasions of her neighboring nations, yet for the same purposes of tyranny, cruelty, and lust, which had dictated the canon law, it was soon adopted by almost all the princes of Europe, and wrought into the constitutions of their government. It was originally a code of laws for a vast army in a perpetual encampment. The general was invested with the sovereign propriety of all the lands within the territory. Of him, as his servants and vassals, the first rank of his great officers held the lands; and in the same manner the other subordinate officers held of them; and all ranks and degrees held their lands by a variety of duties and services, all tending to bind the chains the faster on every order of mankind. In this manner the common people were held together in herds and clans in a state of servile dependence on their lords, bound, even by the tenure of their lands, to follow them, whenever they commanded, to their wars, and in a state of total ignorance of every thing divine and human, excepting the use of arms and the culture of their lands. But another event still more calamitous to human liberty, was a wicked confederacy between the two systems of tyranny above described. i You likely were unaware that Founding Father John Adams spoke so strongly against a union of church and state. And you will not likely hear his views repeated by most modern conservative thinkers or politicians. You will not hear them from the Opus Dei-linked Heritage Foundation, which authored Project 2025, or from Harvard scholar and Catholic Integralist Adrian Vermeule, who openly advocates that the Catholic Church should control the U.S. government. i You will not hear of John Adams treatise on canon and feudal law from adherents of the New Apostolic Reformation, who believe they have a mandate from Christ to control every major aspect of society. ii All these would prefer John Adams be buried in the dustbin of history because he speaks contrary to church/state ambitions. In denouncing canon law, John Adams condemned the Roman Papacy as an engine of superstition and oppression, designed to imprison the minds of the populace in “a state of sordid ignorance and staring timidity”. In denouncing feudal law, he condemned that system of nobles and lords who owned the land, while all the common people were required to serve them, supposedly in exchange for protection. Medieval feudal law finds its echo in the policies of the World Economic Forum. The oft-repeated claim that “you will own nothing and be happy” is in fact nothing less than a call to return to serfdom. The devil, prince of this world, tempted our Savior in the wilderness with the allure of earthly power – the same earthly power that many Christians covet today. Satan took Christ up into an exceedingly high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them and said unto Him, “all these things will I give thee if Thou wilt fall down and worship me.” Jesus replied, “get thee hence, Satan” – see Matthew 4:8-10. It is the antichrist of the Scriptures, that man of sin, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalt himself above all that is called God, who desires temporal power. As soon as he had it he turned persecutor. As soon as modern Christians have civil power, they also will turn persecutor. This has been proven time and again in history, as will be discussed in the next article. In denouncing both canon and feudal law combined, John Adams condemned the unconstitutional aims of a growing and ambitious group of modern Christians who intend to make their “Christianity” the law of the land for the common good of society. The heart of humanity has not changed. Such a system was a curse in the time of the Inquisition, and it would be a curse in our day should it be recreated. 
By Wings of Liberty May 9, 2025
* Bob's your uncle" is a British idiom which means, "there it is